[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:06:08 -0500 |
I wrote:
> I just hacked up a little script to determine which ordering is more
> common. For simplicity, it only considers top-level declarations of the
> form (define-public <pkg-name> (package ...)).
To be more precise, it only considers packages of that form where the
'...' contains both 'home-page' and 'description' fields, so it excludes
most packages that inherit from another package.
Mark
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, (continued)
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Ryan Prior, 2020/12/02
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Hartmut Goebel, 2020/12/02
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Raghav Gururajan, 2020/12/03
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Ryan Prior, 2020/12/03
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Raghav Gururajan, 2020/12/05
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Christopher Baines, 2020/12/05
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Bengt Richter, 2020/12/05
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Raghav Gururajan, 2020/12/20
- Cosmetic changes commits as a potential security risk (was Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits), Mark H Weaver, 2020/12/05
- Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits, Raghav Gururajan, 2020/12/20
- Re: Cosmetic changes commits as a potential security risk (was Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits), Raghav Gururajan, 2020/12/20