[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound
|
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
|
Subject: |
Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:00:37 +0100 |
Wow, impressive! :)
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:
> Note that the plots only show the results using only 1 thread and
Doesn't 1 thread defeat the purpose of parallel compression / decompression?
> Machine used for the tests:
> - CPU: Intel i7-3630QM
> - RAM: 16 MiB
I suppose you meant 16 GiB ;)
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/01/07
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/01/14
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2021/01/14
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Pierre Neidhardt, 2021/01/15
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/01/28
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Pierre Neidhardt, 2021/01/29
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/01/29
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2021/01/29
- Re: When substitute download + decompression is CPU-bound, Pierre Neidhardt, 2021/01/29