Re: Feedback on indentation rules

[Simon Tournier]

Hi,

On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback.  I wonder if some are of the opinion that since
>> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a
>> special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the default
>> indentation rules untouched for it?
>
> Yes, that’s my take and current practice so far: special rules for
> special forms (macros), not for procedures.

What is the rationale?  Being able to know directly at the location when
it is a plain function or a special form?

For what it is worth, I do not see an high difference between the both
indentations.  So, my opinion would to keep the current practise.


Cheers,
simon