Re: [RFC] Cosmetic changes to define-configuration usage

[Katherine Cox-Buday]

On 3/24/23 6:33 AM, Bruno Victal wrote:

> I'd like to propose for field specifications in define-configuration to be 
> separated with a
> blank line between them. Reason for this is that it makes it much easier on the 
> eyes
> to read, rather than being presented with a dense hunk of text to sift through.
>
> I tend to always insert these blank lines when making changes in these parts to 
> aid reading,
> even if they weren't originally present and were not planned to be committed. 
> I'd be happy if
> I could simply keep the line separations and avoid the tedious insert-erase 
> ritual.
>
> I think I'm not alone in this opinion, consider the following snippets:

It's funny how sometimes this works out. I was just hacking on a 
service's configuration and had the same thought. I had spaced 
everything out so that it wasn't as overwhelming, and with a sigh 
grouped it all back together because that's how all existing services work.

I would definitely appreciate this change in the style standard.

--
Katherine