Re: Cuirass actors

[Thompson, David]

Hey Ludo,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:08 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> With this actor split, one could implement another “builder” backend,
> for instance one that talks to a Build Coordinator process.  It’s also
> obviously close to the programming model encouraged by Goblins, which
> should make eventual migration easier (and when that happens, if Goblins
> provides an inter-process transport, we’ll no longer need the custom
> “bridge” and we’ll be able to move actors from one process to another
> much more easily.)

We're obviously very excited by this development over at Spritely. :)

I'm curious to hear more about your inter-process transport needs!

- Dave