Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix

[宋文武]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> +guix-devel
>
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am reaching out since I am receiving in cc patches for Qt, and realise
>> that I do not feel quite confident about them; I added myself because I
>> feel able to work on C code, but I think you are much more involved and
>> competent for Qt than I and also sufficiently numerous, so I could safely
>> remove myself.
>>
>> But when trying to do so, I realised that the situation is a bit convoluted:
>> In addition to a qt team, there is an lxqt team, and I was actually part
>> only of the latter; but the two overlap in claiming responsibility for
>> gnu/packages/qt.scm. Moreover Maxim is part of qt, and 宋文武 and I are
>> part of lxqt.
>
> I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team
> predates qt-team.  We should probably just remove qt.scm from
> lxqt-team's scope.  What do you think?
>
>> So I would suggest to sort this out somehow; maybe merge lxqt into qt?
>
> I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades
> but not much lxqt.

Hello, I have just pushed 2 commits to remove qt.scm from the scope of
lxqt and add myself to the qt team.

Happy weekend!