guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#34154] [PATCH] /etc/os-release


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#34154] [PATCH] /etc/os-release
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:59:26 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:

> I found a man page online from freedesktop.org¹, it seems that it's been
> aborbed by systemd at some point.

OK.

> It looks like some build systems can try to get information from it
> during building if they have distro-specific things to do.

That is precisely the kind of bad practice that I’d rather not
encourage.  :-)

> The only software that I know of that we have that would use it would
> be inxi.  guix environment --ad-hoc inxi-minimal -- inxi -S "Distro:
> Unknown" isn't that big of a deal, and we could just submit a patch
> upstream if we really wanted it fixed.

It has other problems:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix environment -C --ad-hoc inxi-minimal -- inxi -S
sh: tty: command not found
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 17535.
Use of uninitialized value in split at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 17535.
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 3052.
Use of uninitialized value in split at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 3052.
Can't exec "ps": No such file or directory at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 17535.
Use of uninitialized value in split at 
/gnu/store/4x20lf98vwj357zcj6il8zka2d8mr9h0-inxi-minimal-3.0.20-1/bin/.inxi-real
 line 17535.
12System:    12Host ribbon 12Kernel 4.20.3-gnu x86_64 12bits 64 12Console N/A 
12Distro unknown 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> That said, I'm happy enough to plop it in my own os-config and drop the
> patch.

OK, let’s take that route.

That said, I’m clearly opinionated ;-), but if that turns out to be a
hindrance to many, we can revisit this issue.

Thanks,
Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]