guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#36440] [PATCH] Add FreeCAD


From: John Soo
Subject: [bug#36440] [PATCH] Add FreeCAD
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:46:40 -0700

Hi Jonathon,

Thanks for your comments. I was able to apply the patches over current master 
this morning after a fetch. There are some dependencies between the patches. 
The only thing I can think of is to make sure you apply them in order. I’ll 
take a look and adjust to the rest of your comments in the next day or so.

Thanks again.

- John

> On Jul 24, 2019, at 12:52 AM, Jonathan Brielmaier <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> I didn't build all the packages, because it failed to apply them on top
> of current master. Did you rebased it on current master?
> 
> I only comment where I "know" something...
> 
>> On 7/23/19 6:25 PM, John Soo wrote:
>> ** Coin3D
>> 
>> *** DONE Delete blobs
>> 
>> *** hg-fetch deletes .hg dirs (and all submodules' .hg dirs)
> 
> - Usually the (arguments) section is right after the (build-system...)
> but this is more optical :P
> - Wikipedia uses https://bitbucket.org/Coin3D/coin/src but I think the
> link to their wiki https://bitbucket.org/Coin3D/coin/wiki/Home is even
> better :)
> 
>> ** SoQT vs. Quarter
>> 
>> *** Not interchangeable as far as I know.
>> 
>> *** FreeCAD requires SoQT specifically during configure.
> 
> Do we really need SoQT? Neither openSUSE
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/science/FreeCAD nor ArchLinux
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecad/ depending on SoQT
> 
>> ** Pyside2
>> 
>> *** Does all of pyside2 belong in qt.scm? - there are three packages:
>> Shiboken2, Pyside2, and Pyside2-Tools
> 
> qt.scm does already include python and python-xyz, so from this side
> it's not a problem. If pyside* would be used by non QT projects, which
> also doesn't depend on QT it would be good to have it in python-xyz
> module, but I don't think that is the case. So leave them in qt.scm :)
> 
> python-shiboken-2
> Maybe leave a comment that it's a source inside of pyside-setup, because
> the first repo I found was this :)
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/pyside/shiboken.git/
> 
> pyside-2-tools:
> - Maybe elaborate a bit more in the description, I have no idead what
> "lupdate, rcc and uic" is :P
> - Is there a reason why we don't run the tests?
> 
> python-pyside-2:
> - No newlines in the description after a sentence, just two whitespaces :)
> 
>> ** libmedfile
> 
> - description: What is a MED file?
> 
>> *** Reason for old version is that what was released when I started
>> 
>> *** 4.0.0 requires hdf5 >= 1.10.2
>> 
>> **** HDF5 has some dependents:
>> 
>> guix refresh --list-dependent hdf5 Building the following 11 packages would
>> ensure 23 dependent packages are rebuilt:
>> r-ioniser@2.8.0 r-scone@1.8.0 r-lumi@2.36.0 r-yarn@1.10.0
>> r-illuminahumanmethylationepicmanifest@0.3.0 r-scdd@1.8.0 pigx@0.0.3
>> r-pore@0.24 r-yamss@1.10.0 r-xcms@3.6.1 r-msnid@1.18.0
> 
> 20 rebuilds is not a problem.
> 
>> **** HDF5 patches need updates when HDF5 updated to 1.10.5
> 
> So they don't apply anymore at the moment?
> 
>> ** Using releases over hg/git downloads (please advise)
>> 
>> 1. Pyside2 packages - Done for compatibility reasons
>> 2. Coin3D and SoQt - I don't think there are releases of these aside from
>> the bitbucket repository.
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/Coin3D/coin/downloads/
> 
>> 3. LLVM propagated packages (llvm-toolchain and pyside-libcxx-headers)
>> - I am not sure these are the best way to accomplish the goal anyways.
>> - Not sure where to find the right sources for llvm-toolchain-6 and the
>> pyside-libcxx-headers.
>> 4. libarea - Seems like libarea is actually close to not even having source
>> available anymore, let alone a release
>> 5. libspnav - Confused as to the best source to use here. If there is a
>> release or better version, I can update.
> 
> This one:
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/libspnav#n13
> 
>> 6. FreeCAD
>> - I can use the releases if they exist. I do not think they have source
>> tarballs available.
>> - I was packaging during a lot of active development of FreeCAD
>> 
>> Thank you for your review and advice.
> 
> That's it from me at the moment. Strong work! Keep it up :)
> ~Jonathan





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]