guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#38129: [PATCH] gnu: Add sherlock-lv2.


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: bug#38129: [PATCH] gnu: Add sherlock-lv2.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:23:12 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Alexandros Theodotou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Marius,
>
>> I think your MUA might have mangled these
>> patches somehow, as many of them are "corrupt" according to git.  Can
>> you try to resend these?  I'll comment on the patches individually
>> meanwhile.
> Sorry about that. I got Gnome evolution sorted out now so hopefully
> it's better. send-mail doesn't work for me at the moment so I'll add
> the patches as attachments.

Thanks!

>> > +       ("libx11" ,libx11)
>> > +       ("mesa" ,mesa)
>> > +       ("serd" ,serd)
>> > +       ("sratom" ,sratom)))
>> > +    (native-inputs
>> > +     `(("flex" ,flex)
>> > +       ("lv2" ,lv2)
>> > +       ("sord" ,sord)
>> 
>> I don't know anything about LV2 and sord, are these inputs really
>> only
>> used for the build process itself?  :-)
> Sord is an input for sratom (which is in the inputs above), but the
> build fails if I remove this from the native-inputs.

Right, I think I see the problem.  sratom's pkg-config file has this
line:

  Requires: lv2 serd-0 sord-0

Which means that these need to be available when build systems run
e.g. 'pkg-config --cflags sratom-0'.  This is the most common use of
propagated-inputs in Guix.

I went ahead and propagated these from 'sratom', and removed the 'lv2'
and 'sord' inputs.  Let me know if you think something is off!

> For LV2, technically, it's only needed in the build process since it's
> just a header file with specifications. Since this is an LV2 plugin, a
> host that will be loading it will include LV2 itself and will have it
> as an input, so the plugin doesn't really need it. It doesn't hurt to
> add it as an input either, but I think having it as a build input is
> more "correct". By the way, the Arch packagers do the same for most LV2
> plugins.

Right.  Header files are usually architecture-independent, so having
them as native-inputs should be safe.

> From 8bda974a93874bcf366ba78bdf3329f73245e90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexandros Theodotou <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:59:52 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sherlock-lv2.
>
> * gnu/packages/music.scm: (sherlock-lv2): New variable.

Applied (with the dropped inputs), thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]