[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#41689] Add cl-rdkafka
From: |
Katherine Cox-Buday |
Subject: |
[bug#41689] Add cl-rdkafka |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:24:26 -0500 |
That is a mistake; there's no reason it can't be listed as a regular input.
During my tests to confirm this, I realized that sbcl-cl-rdkafka
wasn't actually producing any useful output. This led me down a
rabbit-hole (albeit a productive one). Below is a new patch set.
11:23 kate says: guix refresh -l sbcl-lparallel
Building the following 4 packages would ensure 8 dependent packages
are rebuilt: ecl-cl-rdkafka@1.0.2 cl-rdkafka@1.0.2
cl-random-forest@0.1-0.85fbdd4 next@1.5.0
All dependent packages continue to build.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:01 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > (propagated-inputs
> > `(("librdkafka" ,librdkafka)))
>
> Why is the librdkafka library a propagated input instead of a regular
> input?
0002-gnu-Add-cl-rdkafka.patch
Description: Text Data
0001-gnu-lparallel-Modify-system-definition-to-require-sb.patch
Description: Text Data