guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#42056] [PATCH] gnu: Add xloadimage.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#42056] [PATCH] gnu: Add xloadimage.
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:12:32 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)

Hi Brice,

Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xloadimage): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/xloadimage-debian-series-25.patch: New file …
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): … add it.

[...]

> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/xloadimage-debian-series-25.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,7665 @@
> +Combined patches from Debian: 
> https://sources.debian.org/patches/xloadimage/4.1-25/

We should keep ’em separated, for clarity.

However:

> +Index: xloadimage.4.1.old/Makefile.in
> +===================================================================
> +--- /dev/null
> ++++ xloadimage.4.1.old/Makefile.in

[...]

> +--- /dev/null
> ++++ xloadimage.4.1.old/configure
> +@@ -0,0 +1,2476 @@
> ++#! /bin/sh
> ++
> ++# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
> ++# Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13 
> ++# Copyright (C) 1992, 93, 94, 95, 96 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

This adds an Autoconf-generated ‘configure’ file.  IOW, it seems we’re
adding a complete build system that’s not available upstream.

It seems to me that it’s too much.  It would be okay to add a couple of
Makefile.in and a minimalist ‘configure.ac’, if they’re small, and from
there to run the bootstrap phase.

It would be better to try and use upstream’s build system though.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]