[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#42473] [PATCH] gnu: zrythm: Update to 0.8.694.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#42473] [PATCH] gnu: zrythm: Update to 0.8.694. |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:16:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Alexandros,
Alexandros Theodotou <alex@zrythm.org> skribis:
> This is actually 2 patches. The first updates libcyaml and the 2nd
> Zrythm. Note that I (Zrythm author) have added a trademark policy to
> Zrythm that says modified versions that include the trademarks require
> permission (as discussed on IRC with a few people):
> https://www.zrythm.org/en/trademarks.html
>
> I am not 100% sure if patching the xdg-open path counts as a modified
> version, but in any case this email is signed using the same key used
> to sign the release, so it can be interpreted as "written permission"
> to redistribute this.
OK. Perhaps right above the ‘name’ field of the package, you could add
a link to the trademark policy above and state that Guix has a written
permission to use it, with a link to your message? That way we’ll have
an audit trail.
> The FSDG allows trademarks from what I understand:
Your interpretation seems correct to me.
> So it is up to the maintainers to decide if they want to keep Zrythm as
> it is or rename it. Either way, I am happy with either decision,
> although I would prefer if you were OK with keeping the "Zrythm" name
> (as long as there's no patches to remove/add functionality or links to
> the Zrythm website or things like that).
I don’t see any reason not to keep “Zrythm” as things stand.
Thoughts anyone? (Cc: maintainers.)
Apart from that, the patches LGTM!
Thank you,
Ludo’.