bug#42339: [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-intermediate: Fixup the pre-configure phase.

[Jakub Kądziołka]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:49:17AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Jakub Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> skribis:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> Jakub Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> skribis:
> >> 
> >> > * gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> >> >   (glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash)[arguments]: Don't patch sunrpc,
> >> >   as it's no longer required. Tweak C_INCLUDE_PATH and
> >> >   CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> > The debug output does not refer to a bootstrap glibc anymore whether the 
> >> > phase
> >> > is there or not, though it does refer to gcc-cross-boot0:lib. Does this
> >> > mean that the phase is simply obsolete, and only the hurd parts should
> >> > remain, or is the reference to gcc a bug? Perhaps gcc should have a
> >> > separate output for the includes it provides (stdarg and such) so that
> >> > this reference doesn't bring in the whole mesboot tree? This would
> >> > improve the closure of gcc-toolchain:debug...
> >> 
> >> Oooh, nice.  LGTM!
> >
> > Thanks for your review!
> >
> >> Please confirm that nothing breaks (everything builds at least up to
> >> ‘gcc-final’) and you can push to ‘core-updates’.
> >
> > I have confirmed that hello builds both natively and cross-built. On a
> > similar topic, the same test succeeded for removing the native-gcc input.
> > As the comment suggests, it was only being used for --enable-obsolete-rpc.
> > I am thus considering a v2 that also removes said input. Does that make
> > sense?
> 
> Yes it does (again provided nothing breaks).
> 
> Thank you!

Thanks, patches pushed!

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature