[bug#44460] Add copyright lines

[John Soo]

Hi Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Yes it does!  Initially I wondered if it was a term used in recutils,
> but apparently it’s not.

Do you think it is the best term to use?

>> An aside - Probably to be entirely honest about normalizing the output,
>> locks really would be in a separate record set too.
>
> Yeah.

I made Lock a separate record set. This exposes a limitation with
recutils. It is not possible to join more than two record sets together
(though they mentioned it as a goal on IRC).

>> Another challenge is making sure the user can understand what
>> "normalized" means.  I am not sure readers of the manual/cli help will
>> be able to infer what it means from context.  On the other hand, it is
>> such a small use case that it seems imbalanced to provide a lot of
>> background for the term "normal". What do you think?
>
> Sure.
>
> Thinking more about it, to me the appeal of recutils is that it’s both
> human- and machine-readable.  But here we end up having a specific
> machine-readable variant.  But yeah, maybe that’s unavoidable.

I suppose the normalized version is a little less human-readable.  It
would be behind a flag, though.  Is that a reasonable compromise?

After some thought I realize that the normalized version isn't that much
more useful than the default, but it does enable things like:

---- Example ----
$ guix processes -f normalized \
  | recsel \
    -t ChildProcess \
    -j Session \
    -p PID,Session.PID \
  | recfmt '{{PID}} {{Session.PID}}'
23607 2356724713 2356725002 23576
---- Example ----

This will format all the (PID, Session) pairs. Whereas the
non-normalized version would only print one PID given the following.

---- Example ----
$ guix processes \
  | recsel -p ChildPID,SessionPID \
  | recfmt '{{ChildPID}} {{SessionPID}}'
23607 23567
---

>>>> I wouldn't be opposed to splitting ChildProcess into ChildPID and
>>>> ChildCommand.  I would like it best if that change was made in addition
>>>> to adding the normalized version, since the normalized version allows
>>>> more functionality.
>>>
>>> I would think it’s OK to break compatibility on just these
>>> “ChildProcess” fields.
>>
>> Ok. Would it be ok if I put that in a separate commit?
>
> Yes (you mean in addition to ‘-f normalized’, right?).

I changed ChildProcess: pid: command to ChildPID and ChildCommand in the
default in a separate commit.

Thanks again,

John

0001-processes-Put-ChildProcess-and-ChildPID-on-separate-.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-processes-Optionally-normalize-recutils-output.patch
Description: Text Data