guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v25)


From: Leo Prikler
Subject: [bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v25)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:24:07 +0100
User-agent: Evolution 3.34.2

Am Samstag, den 30.01.2021, 12:46 -0500 schrieb Raghav Gururajan:
> Hi Leo!
> 
> > > +  (let ((commit "cbd43984ebdf783e94c8303c41385bf82aa36d5b")
> > > +        (revision "12"))
> > > +    (hidden-package
> > > +     (package
> > > +       (inherit rlottie)
> > > +       (version
> > > +        (git-version "0.2" revision commit))
> > According to Github, Telegram's rlottie is 19 commits ahead and 193
> > commits behind Samsung's rlottie, whereas Samsung has had 34
> > commits to
> > master since the release of 0.2.  In other words, this should still
> > be
> > 0.1, and I'm not too sure about revision 12.
> 
> The desktop-app/rlottie forked samsung/rlottie at a commit
> corresponding 
> to v0.2. After forking, desktop-app/rlottie made 19 commits. The
> 12th 
> commit is what the package is what this package is building from.
> Hence 
> the revision number 12.
That timeline makes little sense.  The v0.2 release was on August 19th
2020, but the two libraries diverge on August 7th -- again according to
Github.  The files also indicate 0.1.

> > > +    (name "telegram-desktop")
> > > +    (version "2.5.8")
> > Any news w.r.t. tdesktop#10182 in this build?
> 
> Nope! :-(
> 
> But build fails w.r.t updated version of tg_owt. I'll have to send
> v26.
I don't think building static libraries is very guixy.  If 2.5.8 is no
significant improvement over 2.5.1 in that regard, let's stay with the
latter while we can still build shared libraries.

Regards,
Leo






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]