[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#46741] [PATCH] gnu: Return appropriate defconfig for ppc64 (non-LE)
From: |
Carl Dong |
Subject: |
[bug#46741] [PATCH] gnu: Return appropriate defconfig for ppc64 (non-LE) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:30:00 -0500 |
Hmmm does string-prefix? accept regex? And if so perhaps it should be
"powerpc64(le)?-“?
Carl Dong
contact@carldong.me
"I fight for the users"
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 3:17 AM, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03:12PM -0500, Carl Dong wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (system->defconfig): Add "powerpc64-" prefix.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/linux.scm | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
>> index c87c5ffb09..30cbebf849 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
>> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@
>> defconfig. Return the appropriate make target if applicable, otherwise
>> return
>> \"defconfig\"."
>> (cond ((string-prefix? "powerpc-" system) "pmac32_defconfig")
>> + ((string-prefix? "powerpc64-" system) "ppc64_defconfig")
>> ((string-prefix? "powerpc64le-" system) "ppc64_defconfig")
>
> would it make more sense to change it to "powerpc64" or "powerpc(64)?-"?
>
>> (else "defconfig")))
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
> GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP