[bug#49329] [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package

[Leo Prikler]

Am Samstag, den 10.07.2021, 21:53 -0700 schrieb Chris Marusich:
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> 
> > * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (python2-renpy)[description]:
> > Mention,
> > that it's only used for bootstrapping renpy.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/game-development.scm | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/game-development.scm b/gnu/packages/game-
> > development.scm
> > index 22c44a585c..9b231ad333 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/game-development.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/game-development.scm
> > @@ -1250,8 +1250,10 @@ developed mainly for Ren'py.")
> >         ("xdg-utils" ,xdg-utils)))
> >      (home-page "https://www.renpy.org/";)
> >      (synopsis "Ren'py python module")
> > -    (description "This package contains the shared libraries and
> > Python
> > -modules of Ren'py.")
> > +    (description "This package contains the shared libraries and
> > Python modules
> > +of Ren'py.  While functional, they are not meaningful on their own
> > without
> > +the launcher and common Ren'py code provided by the @code{renpy}
> > package and
> > +are only used to bootstrap it.")
> >      (license license:expat)))
> >  
> >  (define-public renpy
> 
> LGTM.  If this isn't meant to be installed by users, should it be
> non-public or perhaps hidden?
Good point, but I don't think users will accidentally install it like
they do with gcc.  This description was written to address a point made
by Ludovic in IRC concerning the package's lack of one.  Having the
package publicly exported also makes my own life easier when updating
the recipe.  Last, but not least, these are functional modules and
could be used to develop code, that depends on Ren'py's internals, but
none of the "common" renpy stuff (or the common renpy stuff could
otherwise be extracted from the renpy package and changed to the
developer's desires).

Regards,
Leo