guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#50157] [PATCH] gnu: Add xpadneo.


From: Leo Prikler
Subject: [bug#50157] [PATCH] gnu: Add xpadneo.
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 14:03:29 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.34.2

Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2021, 14:32 +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 12:08:57PM +0200, Leo Prikler wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2021, 11:58 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > > Leo Prikler schreef op zo 22-08-2021 om 00:00 [+0200]:
> > > > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (xpadneo): New variable.
> > > > ---
> > > >  gnu/packages/linux.scm | 52
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> > > > index 7b92be4b9c..385cdd558b 100644
> > > > --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> > > > +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> > > > @@ -1505,6 +1505,58 @@ allows some more serious things like
> > > > adding
> > > > streaming capabilities to an
> > > >  application by hooking GStreamer into the loopback device.")
> > > >      (license license:gpl2+)))
> > > >  
> > > > +(define-public xpadneo
> > > > +  (package
> > > > +    (name "xpadneo")
> > > > +    (version "0.9.1")
> > > > +    (source (origin
> > > > +              (method git-fetch)
> > > > +              (uri (git-reference
> > > > +                    (url "https://github.com/atar-axis/xpadneo
> > > > ")
> > > > +                    (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> > > > +              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> > > > +              (sha256
> > > > +               (base32
> > > > +                "0xr0zx134s56h4ij6c3fh8ki0h58h61minbfxcl3sgpgx
> > > > kh14
> > > > ism"))))
> > > > +    (build-system linux-module-build-system)
> > > > +    (arguments
> > > > +     `(#:tests? #f ; no `check' target
> > > > +       #:modules (((guix build copy-build-system) #:prefix
> > > > copy:)
> > > > +                  (guix build linux-module-build-system)
> > > > +                  (guix build utils))
> > > > +       #:imported-modules
> > > > +       ((guix build copy-build-system)
> > > > +        ,@%linux-module-build-system-modules)
> > > > +       #:phases
> > > > +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> > > > +         (replace 'configure
> > > > +           (lambda args
> > > > +             (with-directory-excursion "hid-xpadneo/src"
> > > > +               (apply (assoc-ref %standard-phases 'configure)
> > > > args))))
> > > > +         (replace 'build
> > > > +           (lambda args
> > > > +             (with-directory-excursion "hid-xpadneo/src"
> > > > +               (apply (assoc-ref %standard-phases 'build)
> > > > args))))
> > > > +         (replace 'install
> > > > +           (lambda args
> > > > +             (with-directory-excursion "hid-xpadneo/src"
> > > > +               (apply (assoc-ref %standard-phases 'install)
> > > > args))))
> > > 
> > > It might be a bit simpler to add a 'chdir' phase:
> > > 
> > >     (add-after 'unpack 'chdir
> > >       (lambda _
> > >         (chdir "hid-xpadneo/src")))
> > > 
> > > instead of these 'with-directory-excursion'.
> > That may be true, but in that case there's no "clean" way of
> > exiting. 
> > I could do (chdir "..") in post-install, but that feels weird.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> 
> Where is the license file located? You could add a phaes after
> 'install
> to chdir back ".." and then just use install-file for the files for
> etc.
> Then the 'install-license phase would also work correctly.
The license file is at the root of the tree.  FWIW, there is an ongoing
issue on whether to interpret the license as GPL3 or GPL3+ [1], which I
interpreted as the latter for a lack of file headers.

So in the chdir case, I would have to chdir two to three times,
depending on how much I want to type, leaving the CWD dirty between
phase changes.  The directory-excursion hack is a little more verbose,
but mostly captures my intent and needs to be applied exactly thrice. 
One could probably make it even smarter by writing a lambda for the
phase rewriting or instead provide build-system support for linux
modules in subdirectories.  (Perhaps we could even add modify-phases
support to add "advice" to phases Emacs-style.)

Regards,
Leo

[1] https://github.com/atar-axis/xpadneo/issues/289






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]