guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter


From: pukkamustard
Subject: [bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:33:39 +0000

I suggest reverting commit 33a1ec29fa0ad72c61cef13c8af08c847eb399c1
('guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.') and instead
applying attached patch.

The attached patch sets the '--release' flag instead of '--profile
release'. From 'dune --help':

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--release
   Put dune into a reproducible release mode. This is in fact a
   shorthand for --root . --ignore-promoted-rules --no-config
   --profile release --always-show-command-line
   --promote-install-files --default-target @install. You should use
   this option for release builds. For instance, you must use this
   option in your <package>.opam files. Except if you already use -p,
   as -p implies this option.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I think this is what we want.

Setting '--profile release' was not enough and was causing
inconsistencies with packages that were building with the '-p' flag.

-pukkamustard

Attachment: 0001-guix-dune-build-system-Put-dune-into-a-reproducible-.patch
Description: Text Data


pukkamustard <pukkamustard@posteo.net> writes:

> I submitted #50180 to fix builds of ocaml-ppx-hash.
>
> The impact of this seems to be smaller than I feared. Maybe reverting is not 
> necessary.
>
> Still I don't really understand what's going on. I will try and find a 
> concise example and ask the Dune people.
>
> pukkamustard <pukkamustard@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> pukkamustard <pukkamustard@posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>> For example ocaml-ppxlib builds properly but seems to be broken. Anything 
>>> depending on ocaml-ppxlib fails with the errors:
>>
>> This is not true. ocaml-ppx-hash fails to build. But other things depending 
>> on ocaml-ppxlib seem to build fine (e.g. ocaml-ppx-optional, 
>> ocaml-ppx-assert).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]