guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#51091] [PATCH v3] guix: opam: Do not fail when refreshing.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#51091] [PATCH v3] guix: opam: Do not fail when refreshing.
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:16:32 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> skribis:

> I forgot to remove the catch #t around the whole body of the function.
> I noticed that guard* was raising &non-continuable so I tried to fix it
> by using raise-continuable from (ice-9 exceptions). Is this the correct
> solution?

I suppose, though I’m not sure why it needs to be continuable: you could
just catch the exception and move on to the next package?

> From a60e2ca645f4f8a6da72111d047f8cbb41ebe3e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: 
> <a60e2ca645f4f8a6da72111d047f8cbb41ebe3e6.1637284512.git.julien@lepiller.eu>
> From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 04:58:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] import: opam: Do not fail when refreshing.
>
> Because we throw an error when a package is not in the opam repository,
> the updater would crash when encountering a package that is not in opam
> but uses the ocaml-build-system, such as opam itself.  This catches the
> error and continues without updating said package, and lets us update
> the rest of the packages.
>
> * guix/scripts/import/opam.scm (guix-import-opam): Catch not-found
> condition and leave.
> * guix/import/opam.scm (&opam-not-found-error): New condition type.
> (opam-fetch): Raise condition instead of leaving.
> (latest-release): Catch not-found condition and warn.
> (conditional): Rename from `condition'.
> * tests/opam.scm (parse-conditions): Change accordingly.

[...]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> I think <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/51888> is simpler and fix the same thing.

I’m fine either way.  I think there’s value longer-term in having
structured exceptions in importers, though.

Julien: your call!

Thanks,
Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]