[bug#51903] cmn license etc

[Guillaume Le Vaillant]

bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU skribis:

> The license entry in cmn.asd is incorrect -- I never
> noticed that Rick Taube specified GPL.  The BSD
> or MIT licenses are ok.  I wrote all of cmn; Rick was
> just helping by adding the asd file, and I paid no
> attention to it.  We weren't so concerned with licenses
> in those days.  (I'll update the ccrma tarball).
>
> cmn-all.lisp builds cmn fine for me -- is the problem
> the directory?  Also to run it you need to be in
> the cmn package.
>
> Thanks for your interest in this software!

Hi,

I took a look at this package and I noticed that the tarball doesn't
contain an asd file anymore. Instead of removing it, wouldn't it be
possible to just put the correct license in the asdf system definition?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature