[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt.
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
[bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt. |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2022 22:53:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Brandon Lucas schreef op za 22-01-2022 om 21:28 [+0000]:
> + (license license:lgpl3+)))
The lgpl3+ is by itself not a complete license, it is structured as a
few exceptions under conditions to the gpl. The lgpl3 even asks you to
include both a copy of the GPL3 and the LGPL3 license text:
https://git.sr.ht/~technomancy/fnlfmt/tree/main/item/LICENSE#L91
b) Accompany the Combined Work with a copy of the GNU GPL and this
license document.
Strictly speaking that's only for ‘Combined works’, and I don't expect
any trouble in practice. However, it would be nice to do things
properly. Would you be up to asking upstream to include a copy of the
GPL as well (which upstream isn't doing currently)?
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Brandon Lucas, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Maxime Devos, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Maxime Devos, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Maxime Devos, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Maxime Devos, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Maxime Devos, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH] gnu: Add fnlfmt.,
Maxime Devos <=
- [bug#53456] [PATCH v2 1/2] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Brandon Lucas, 2022/01/22
- [bug#53456] [PATCH v3 1/2] gnu: Add fnlfmt., Brandon Lucas, 2022/01/23