[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53895: [PATCH 0/5] More CPU detection
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
bug#53895: [PATCH 0/5] More CPU detection |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:04:26 +0200 |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:42:44PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
> >> What we could do is extend ‘if-flags’ so that it can optionally check
> >> for a family number:
> >>
> >> (if-flags ((family 22) "movbe" => "btver2")
> >> …)
> >
> > Another option would be to just move it to the bottom of the if-flags so
> > it should take effect then.
>
> Yes, your call!
Just moving it to the end didn't end up being enough to make it work, my
processor was determined to be <unspecified>. I changed it to an 'or'
which seemed to make it work, and my testing seemed to show that it
would work (alternating substituting junk and my processor flags to make
it obviously one or the other).
Thanks for the review and the feedback. And for doing the work in the
first place!
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[bug#53895] [PATCH 4/5] gnu: gcc: Add compiler-cpu-architectures for armhf., Efraim Flashner, 2022/02/09
[bug#53895] [PATCH 5/5] WIP: guix: cpu: Add detection for aarch64 CPUs., Efraim Flashner, 2022/02/09