[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootst
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
[bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles. |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:46:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.1 |
Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 18:20 -0500 schrieb Philip McGrath:
> > Now to explain the difference between my suggestion and what you
> > implemented. Mine would be to
> > (define-public (chez-scheme-bootstrap-bootfiles chez-scheme)
> > ...)
> > where ... is the code you already have. This would not only work
> > for other chez-schemes than the one we have packaged, but might
> > also make it possible to cross module boundaries, i.e. keep chez-
> > scheme in chez.scm. WDYT?
>
> I still don't think I understand. How would this avoid having to
> override almost everything for both the upstream and Racket variants
> of the package, as
> was the case in my attempt in <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53878#44>
> (also at
> <
> https://gitlab.com/philip1/guix-patches/-/blob/guix-issue-53878-v2-bootfiles-proc/gnu/packages/chez-and-racket-bootstrap.scm#L723
> >)? I mean, you could put
> the upstream stuff under the `lambda` for now, but eventually it will
> also need a build phase and some inputs. I just don't see what the
> benefit all that would achieve, or what the problem is (if there is
> one) with this patch.
The concern is not w.r.t variants, but version bumps, assuming that
bootstrap mostly stays the same from e.g. Racket 8.4 → 8.5 (I don't
have the Chez version in the back of my head atm, but you get the gist)
Will be looking at v3.
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 09/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cgc., (continued)
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 11/15] gnu: Add chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 13/15] gnu: chez-mit: Support chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 14/15] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add 'chez-scheme-for-system'., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 10/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-bc., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/02/18
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/18
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 08/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap bootfiles.,
Liliana Marie Prikler <=
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 12/15] gnu: Add racket-vm-cs., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 15/15] gnu: racket: Update to 8.4., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/17
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 15/15] gnu: racket: Update to 8.4., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/02/18
- [bug#53878] [PATCH v2 15/15] gnu: racket: Update to 8.4., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/18
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 02/11] gnu: chez-scheme: Use "lib/chez-scheme" for search path., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/13
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 08/11] gnu: Add chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/13
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 08/11] gnu: Add chez-scheme-for-racket., Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/02/14
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 08/11] gnu: Add chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/16
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 09/11] gnu: chez-mit: Support chez-scheme-for-racket., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/13
- [bug#53878] [PATCH 10/11] gnu: chez-and-racket-bootstrap: Add 'chez-scheme-for-system'., Philip McGrath, 2022/02/13