[bug#54036] [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Update to 0.15.3.

[Maxim Cournoyer]

tags 54036 moreinfo
thanks

Hi Tanguy,

Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:

> Hi Guix,
>
> The lint command reports problems that I don't know how and if I have to fix:
>
> ```
> […]/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm:268:4: gnunet@0.15.3: label 'gnutls' does not 
> match package name 'gnutls-dane'
> […]/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm:268:4: gnunet@0.15.3: label 'libidn' does not 
> match package name 'libidn2'
> […]/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm:268:4: gnunet@0.15.3: label 'libjpeg' does not 
> match package name 'libjpeg-turbo'
> […]/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm:360:14: gnunet@0.15.3: permanent redirect from 
> https://gnunet.org/ to https://www.gnunet.org/en/
> ```

Running './pre-inst-env guix style gnunet' should take care of the first
3.  For the last one, I'd use the new suggested URL.

> Any help welcome!
>
> Tanguy
>
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): Update to 0.15.3.
> [arguments] Disable failing tests.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
> index 1c09c9047b..34c6efddcb 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ (define-public gnurl
>  (define-public gnunet
>    (package
>     (name "gnunet")
> -   (version "0.13.1")
> +   (version "0.15.3")
>     (source
>      (origin
>        (method url-fetch)
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ (define-public gnunet
>                            ".tar.gz"))
>        (sha256
>         (base32
> -        "15jnca5zxng7r6m3qzq9lr73xxq0v6mvcp0lny3zrlkz5s2nmmq3"))))
> +        "1iafi1rzx62lf26awmwk17ih3y7kyhr7mrqc4am8w1qyyjl6j9nn"))))
>     (build-system gnu-build-system)
>     (inputs
>      `(("bluez" ,bluez)
> @@ -301,6 +301,8 @@ (define-public gnunet
>                (("test_transport_api_manipulation_cfg\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") 
> "")
>                (("test_transport_api_udp_nat\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
>                (("test_transport_blacklisting_multiple_plugins\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) 
> \\\\\n") ""))
> +            (substitute* "src/cadet/Makefile"
> +              (("test_cadet_2_speed_reliable\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") ""))
>              (substitute* "src/testbed/Makefile"
>                (("test_testbed_api_2peers_1controller\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") 
> "")
>                (("test_testbed_api_statistics\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
> @@ -308,13 +310,24 @@ (define-public gnunet
>                (("test_testbed_api_test_timeout\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
>                (("test_testbed_api_topology\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
>                (("test_testbed_api_topology_clique\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") 
> ""))
> +            (substitute* "src/testing/Makefile"
> +              (("test_testing_api_cmd_netjail\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
> +              (("test_testing_peerstartup\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") "")
> +              (("test_testing_peerstartup2\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") ""))
>              (substitute* "src/topology/Makefile"
>                (("^check_PROGRAMS.*") "\n")
>                (("test_gnunet_daemon_topology\\$\\(EXEEXT\\)\n") ""))
>              (substitute* "src/namestore/Makefile"
> -              (("\\$\\(am__append_2\\)") ""))
> +              (("\\$\\(am__append_2\\)") "")
> +              ((" test_namestore_lookup\\.sh ") " "))
> +            (substitute* "src/fs/Makefile"
> +              (("test_fs_search_with_and\\$\\(EXEEXT\\) \\\\\n") ""))
>              (substitute* "src/gns/Makefile"
> -              (("\\$\\(am__append_4\\)") ""))
> +              (("\\$\\(am__append_4\\)") "")
> +              (("test_gns_caa_lookup.sh test_gns_mx_lookup.sh") 
> "test_gns_caa_lookup.sh"))
> +            (substitute* "src/revocation/Makefile"
> +              (("^check_SCRIPTS.*") "")
> +              (("  test_local_revocation.py\n") ""))
>              (substitute* "contrib/Makefile"
>                (("^check_PROGRAMS.*") "\n"))
>              ;; 'test' from coreutils doesn't behave as the test expects.

These needs to be commented to show that we understand why they fail and
why it's OK/expected in our build environment.  If we don't understand
why we need to investigate more/seek support from the GNUnet authors so
that they can help us figure it out or fix real problems on their end.

Thank you,

Maxim