[bug#54078] [PATCH] gnu: add libaml, libneatvnc, and wayvnc

[kitzman]

Dear Maxime,

> Is propagation necessary here?  Would regular inputs suffice?
> (Propagation can cause propagation conflicts and other issues.)

That is true, the inputs were wrong.

> ‘Liberally licensed’: the package definition has a 'license' field
> that should be sufficient for the user to determine if they like the
> license or not.  Also, please keep the descriptions descriptive, no
> marketing phrases ‘liberal’, ‘fast, and ‘neat’

Instead of copying the repo's description, now there are some
functionalities of the library. However, it is unknown if they work with
all clients. Do you think it's worth mentioning?

0002-gnu-add-libneatvnc.patch
Description: libneatvnc package

Kind regards,
Kitzman