|
From: | Luis Henrique Gomes Higino |
Subject: | [bug#49946] [WIP PATCH v3 00/26] gnu: Add tree-sitter for emacs (and neovim as well?). |
Date: | Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:30:21 -0300 |
User-agent: | mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 |
Hi Guix, Hi Pierre, I apologize for my delay, the last few weeks were quite busy :-/. Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com> writes:
I'm sharing it early as a WIP first, as I just noticed the other day that Luis also contributed a patches for tree-sitter for neovim[0]. The series I have here is quite a lot bigger though so I'm happy to rebase it on top of yours, Luis :-). The package I had for tree-sitter looksbasically the same, I would then move it to a new file with all tree-sitter related packages, if you're happy with that.
That's OK by me!
So I'm wondering, are these tree-sitter grammar packages also useful forthe neovim package for tree-sitter?
I'm not exactly sure about this. Currently, most Neovim users install their grammars through the installer included in https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter. That ensures the user gets the version that is ABI compatible with nvim-treesitter. That makes me uncertain if we could use the same grammar packages for Neovim and Emacs, at least for now.
I do wonder if I'm going about it the right way for Guix though, for instance I'm wondering if I should rewrite the grammar packages using a new custom build system, do people think it would be worth it? Thatcould be done as a follow-up of course.
I'm not a very experienced packager myself, but from what I saw in your patch, it seems rather unnecessary, as the grammar packages are very simple.
-- Luis H. Higino
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |