[bug#54311] [PATCH] gnu: tint2: Update to 17.0.2.

[Jaft]

> On Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 03:57:51 PM CST, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 
> <me@tobias.gr> wrote: 
>
>
>
>
>
> What Maxime means is that some forges (like GitHub) generate these archives 
> on the fly, instead of the author uploading a 'stable' file.  You can usually 
> tell them apart by the URL, but I forget GitLab's conventions.
>
> These archives might be cached for a while but if they are regenerated the 
> hash could change even if the unpacked data didn't.  This has happened in the 
> past and breaks e.g. guix time-machine even if 'fixed' on master.
>
> Hence we prefer git-fetch when available, or tarballs that look 
> human-generated.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R

Ahhh; I see. Thanks a ton for the explanation, Tobias. I'll get this switched 
over to git-fetch, Maxime, while I look over your other feedback.