[bug#54352] [PATCH] services: dnsmasq: Add more options.

[Maxime Devos]

Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 21-03-2022 om 16:22 [+0100]:
> I think this suggestion is beyond the scope of this review: we’ve never
> used sanitizers like this before (or almost), and this particular piece
> of code doesn’t use them.
> 
> Also, with the recent discussion about the introduction of contracts,
> I’d rather wait an use contracts everywhere once they’re available.

Seems reasonable to me, given that the specifics weren't discussed yet,
although _everywhere_ (for all procedures, records, ...) seems a bit
much, unless you meant every field of the dnsmasq record.

Greetings,
Maxime.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part