[bug#54561] [PATCH 1/4] services: Add samba service.

[Maxime Devos]

fesoj000 schreef op zo 27-03-2022 om 03:07 [+0200]:
> > +(define (samba-activation config)
> > +  (let ((package (samba-configuration-package config))
> > +        (config-file (samba-configuration-config-file config)))
> > +    (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
> > +      (let ((lib-directory "/var/lib/samba")
> > +            (log-directory "/var/log/samba")
> > +            (run-directory "/var/run/samba")
> > +            (smb.conf "/etc/samba/smb.conf"))

Is it necessary to put the configuration file there?
Can be we do something like (system* "/.../testparm" #$smb.conf), where
smb.conf is the generated configuration file?

> > +        #~(begin
> > +            (use-modules (guix build utils))
> > +
> > +            (mkdir-p #$log-directory)
> > +            (mkdir-p #$run-directory)
> > +            (mkdir-p (string-append #$lib-directory "/private"))
> > +            (mkdir-p "/etc/samba")
> > +            (copy-file #$config-file #$smb.conf)
> > +            (system* (string-append #$package "/bin/testparm")
> > +                     "--suppress-prompt" #$smb.conf))))))
> Is it a good idea to create all those directories with the default
> umask? I always wanted to investigate which of those directories
> contains sensitive data. I never got around to.

FWIW, you can use 'mkdir-p/perms' to set the permission bits.
The (string-append ...) can be simplified to:

  (system* #$(file-append package "/bin/testparm" "--suppres-prompt
#$smb.conf).

Also, would it be a good idea to use (invoke ...) instead of system, to
make sure errors are detected?  What is the 'suppress-prompt' for?

Greetings,
Maxime.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part