|
From: | Hartmut Goebel |
Subject: | [bug#54796] [PATCH v4 00/22] Add importer for hex.pm and rebar3 build-system for Erlang |
Date: | Thu, 5 May 2022 14:56:37 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 |
Am 11.04.22 um 14:04 schrieb Maxime Devos:
If rebar2, rebar3 and rebar4 would require completely different phases and use different file formats or such, IMO a separate build system (and hence, a 2, 3 or 4 suffix) may be useful.
It took some time to come to a conclusion for me on this:I'm going to rename it into „rebar-build-system“ (without the number). If need arises for some rebar4-build-system, we can still think about adding „rebar3-build-system” as an alias.
Rational:I assume, some rebar2 and rebar4 build-systems would have the same phases. „Just” commands might be different. Eg. rebar2 did just „compile“ while rebar3 can have „as prod compile“ — which could be handled with different means.
-- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |