[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#56046] [PATCH] services: mail: add opensmtpd records to enhance ope
|
From: |
jbranso |
|
Subject: |
[bug#56046] [PATCH] services: mail: add opensmtpd records to enhance opensmtpd-configuration. Version 2 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2022 21:51:19 +0000 |
July 6, 2022 12:27 AM, "Liliana Marie Prikler" <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 04.07.2022 um 17:17 -0400 schrieb Joshua Branson:
>
>> Openmstpd-configuration may only be configured by a config-file.
>> This
>> patch, enables one to configure opensmtpd by using some guile record
>> types (defined via define-record-type*).
>>
>> * gnu/services/mail.scm: New records (opensmtpd-table-
>> configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-ca-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-pki-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-maildir-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-mda-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-option-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-filter-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-match-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-smtp-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-srs-configuration),
>> (opensmtpd-queue-configuration), and
>> (opensmtpd-configuration).
>
> Not a ChangeLog.
I'll actually go and learn how to do that thanks.
>
>> New procedures: false?, is-value-right-type, add-comma-or-string,
>> file-exists?, list-of-procedures->string, string-in-list?, my-
>> sanitize,
>> opensmtpd-filter-chain?, throw-error-duplicate-option,
>> sanitize-list-of-options-for-match-configuration, sanitize-filters,
>> list-has-duplicates-or-non-filters?,
>> filter-phase-has-message-and-value?,
>> filter-phase-decision-lacks-proper-message?,
>> filter-phase-lacks-proper-value?,
>> filter-phase-has-incorrect-junk-or-bypass?,
>> filter-phase-junks-after-commit?,
>> list-of-unique-filter-or-filter-phase?, throw-error,
>> contains-duplicate?, list-of-type?, list-of-strings?,
>> list-of-unique-opensmtpd-option-configuration?,
>> list-of-opensmtpd-ca-configuration?,
>> list-of-opensmtpd-pki-configuration?,
>> list-of-opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration?,
>> list-of-unique-opensmtpd-match-configuration?, list-of-strings-
>> string,
>> assoc-list? assoc-list, variable->string,
>> table-whose-data-are-assoc-list?,
>> table-whose-data-are-a-list-of-strings?, assoc-list->string,
>> opensmtpd-table-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-lmtp-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-mda-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-maildir-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-action->string, opensmtpd-option-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-match-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-ca-configuration->string, opensmtpd-pki-configuration-
>> string,
>> generate-filter-chain-name, opensmtpd-filter-chain->string,
>> opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration->string, opensmtpd-filters-
>> string,
>> opensmtpd-configuration-listen->string,
>> opensmtpd-configuration-srs->string,
>> opensmtpd-smtp-configuration->string,
>> opensmtpd-configuration-queue->string, get-opensmtpd-actions,
>> get-opensmtpd-pki-configurations, get-opensmtpd-filters, flatten,
>> get-opensmtpd-tables, opensmtpd-configuration-fieldname->string,
>> list-of-records->string, opensmtpd-configuration->mixed-text-file.
>
> Neither is this.
>> * doc/guix.texi added documentation for the new records for
>> opensmtpd.
>
> Or this.
>
>> ---
>> doc/guix.texi | 1051 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> gnu/services/mail.scm | 2016
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 3056 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
>> index eda0956260..e8564240d1 100644
>> --- a/doc/guix.texi
>> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
>> @@ -24849,14 +24849,59 @@ could instantiate a dovecot service like
>> this:
>> @subsubheading OpenSMTPD Service
>>
>> @deffn {Scheme Variable} opensmtpd-service-type
>> -This is the type of the @uref{https://www.opensmtpd.org, OpenSMTPD}
>> -service, whose value should be an @code{opensmtpd-configuration}
>> object
>> -as in this example:
>> -
>> -@lisp
>> -(service opensmtpd-service-type
>> - (opensmtpd-configuration
>> - (config-file (local-file "./my-smtpd.conf"))))
>> +OpenSMTPD is an easy-to-use mail transfer agent (MTA). Its
>> configuration file is
>> +throughly documented in @code{man 5 smtpd.conf}. OpenSMTPD
>> @strong{listens} for incoming
>> +mail and @strong{matches} the mail to @strong{actions}. The
>> following records represent those
>> +stages:
>> +
>> +@multitable {aaaaaaaaa}
>> {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>
> I suggest using fractions here.
I'll take a look at the texinfo fractions bit. This was all generated
from an org-mode document.
>
>> [...]
>> +This is a string of one of these options:
>> +
>> +@multitable {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>> {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>
> Same here. Btw. I did not actually check all the doc in between, so I
> might be missing something.
>> +@multitable {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>> {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>
> Likewise.
>> +@multitable {aaaaaaaaaa}
>> {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}
>
> You get the drill.
>
>> [more doc with strange multitables]
>> diff --git a/gnu/services/mail.scm b/gnu/services/mail.scm
>> index d99743ac31..2a344e303e 100644
>> --- a/gnu/services/mail.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/services/mail.scm
>> @@ -57,8 +57,143 @@ (define-module (gnu services mail)
>> mailbox-configuration
>> namespace-configuration
>>
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration-name
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration-file-db
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration-data
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-ca-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-ca-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-ca-configuration-name
>> + opensmtpd-ca-configuration-file
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration-domain
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration-cert
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration-key
>> + opensmtpd-pki-configuration-dhe
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-method
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-alias
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-ttl
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-user
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-userbase
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-virtual
>> + opensmtpd-action-local-delivery-configuration-wrapper
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-maildir-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-maildir-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-maildir-configuration-pathname
>> + opensmtpd-maildir-configuration-junk
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-mda-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-mda-configuration-name
>> + opensmtpd-mda-configuration-command
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-backup
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-backup-mx
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-helo
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-domain
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-host
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-pki
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-srs
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-tls
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-auth
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-mail-from
>> + opensmtpd-action-relay-configuration-src
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration-option
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration-not
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration-regex
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration-data
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-name
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-phase-name
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-options
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-decision
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-message
>> + opensmtpd-filter-phase-configuration-value
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-filter-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-filter-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-filter-configuration-name
>> + opensmtpd-filter-configuration-proc
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-interface
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-family
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-auth
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-auth-optional
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-filters
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-hostname
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-hostnames
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-mask-src
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-disable-dsn
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-pki
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-port
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-proxy-v2
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-received-auth
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-senders
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-secure-connection
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration-tag
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration-filters
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration-mask-src
>> + opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration-tag
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-match-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-match-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-match-configuration-action
>> + opensmtpd-match-configuration-options
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration-ciphers
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration-limit-max-mails
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration-limit-max-rcpt
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration-max-message-size
>> + opensmtpd-smtp-configuration-sub-addr-delim character
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-srs-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-srs-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-srs-configuration-key
>> + opensmtpd-srs-configuration-backup-key
>> + opensmtpd-srs-configuration-ttl-delay
>> +
>> + opensmtpd-queue-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-queue-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-queue-configuration-compression
>> + opensmtpd-queue-configuration-encryption
>> + opensmtpd-queue-configuration-ttl-delay
>> +
>> opensmtpd-configuration
>> opensmtpd-configuration?
>> + opensmtpd-package
>> + opensmtpd-config-file
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-bounce
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-listen-ons
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-listen-on-socket
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-includes
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-matches
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-mda-wrappers
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-mta-max-deferred
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-srs
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-smtp
>> + opensmtpd-configuration-queue
>> +
>> opensmtpd-service-type
>> %default-opensmtpd-config-file
>>
>> @@ -1651,13 +1786,1888 @@ (define (generate-dovecot-documentation)
>> ;;; OpenSMTPD.
>> ;;;
>>
>> +;; some fieldnames have a default value of #f, which is ok. They
>> cannot have a value of #t.
>> +;; for example opensmtpd-table-configuration-data can be #f, BUT NOT
>> true.
>> +;; my/sanitize procedure tests values to see if they are of the
>> right kind.
>> +;; procedure false? is needed to allow fields like 'values' to be
>> blank, (empty), or #f BUT also
>> +;; have a value like a list of strings.
>> +(define (false? var)
>> + (eq? #f var))
>
> I'm pretty sure it'd be fine to use not in lieu of false?, even at the
> risk of matching nil.
Sounds ok. I may need to double check that there are no places
that have nil values.
>
>> +;; this procedure takes in a var and a list of procedures. It loops
>> through list of procedures passing in var to each.
>> +;; if one procedure returns #t, the function returns true.
>> Otherwise #f.
>> +;; TODO for fun rewrite this using map
>> +;; If I rewrote it in map, then it may help with sanitizing.
>> +;; eg: I could then potentially easily sanitize vars with lambda
>> procedures.
>> +(define (is-value-right-type? var list-of-procedures record
>> fieldname)
>> + (if (null? list-of-procedures)
>> + #f
>> + (cond [(procedure? (car list-of-procedures))
>> + (if ((car list-of-procedures) var)
>> + #t
>> + (is-value-right-type? var (cdr list-of-
>> procedures) record fieldname))]
>> + [(and (sanitize-configuration? (car list-of-
>> procedures))
>> + (sanitize-configuration-error-if-proc-fails (car
>> list-of-procedures))
>> + (if ((sanitize-configuration-proc (car list-of-
>> procedures)) var)
>> + #t
>> + (begin
>> + (apply string-append
>> + (sanitize-configuration-error-
>> message (car list-of-procedures)))
>> + (throw 'bad! var))))]
>> + [else (if ((sanitize-configuration-proc (car list-of-
>> procedures)) var)
>> + #t
>> + (is-value-right-type? var (cdr list-of-
>> procedures) record fieldname))])))
>
> Don't we have field sanitizers already that make this obsolete?
>
>> +;; converts strings like this:
>> +;; "apple, ham, cherry" -> "apple, ham, or cherry"
>> +;; "pineapple" -> "pinneapple".
>> +;; "cheese, grapefruit, or jam" -> "cheese, grapefruit, or jam"
>> +(define (add-comma-or string)
>> + (define last-comma-location (string-rindex string #\,))
>> + (if last-comma-location
>> + (if (string-contains string ", or" last-comma-location)
>> + string
>> + (string-replace string ", or" last-comma-location
>> + (+ 1 last-comma-location)))
>> + string))
>> +
>> +;; I could test for read-ability of a file, but then I would have to
>> +;; test the program as root everytime instead of as a normal user...
>> +(define (file-exists? file)
>> +(if (string? file)
>> + (access? file F_OK)
>> + #f))
>
> Is this not part of the Guile standard library?
I do not believe that guile has a file-exists? thunk.
I could use (access? file F_OK) every time, but I think
file-exists? is easier to use. My two cents.
>
>> +(define (list-of-procedures->string procedures)
>> + (define string
>> + (let loop ([procedures procedures])
>> + (if (null? procedures)
>> + ""
>> + (begin
>> + (string-append
>> + (cond [(eq? false? (car procedures))
>> + "#f , "]
>> + [(eq? boolean? (car procedures))
>> + "boolean, "]
>> + [(eq? string? (car procedures))
>> + "string, "]
>> + [(eq? integer? (car procedures))
>> + "integer, "]
>> + [(eq? list-of-strings? (car procedures))
>> + "list of strings, "]
>> + [(eq? assoc-list? (car procedures))
>> + "an association list, "]
>> + [(eq? opensmtpd-pki-configuration? (car
>> procedures))
>> + "an <opensmtpd-pki-configuration> record, "]
>> + [(eq? opensmtpd-table-configuration? (car
>> procedures))
>> + "an <opensmtpd-table-configuration> record, "]
>> + [(eq? list-of-unique-opensmtpd-match-
>> configuration? (car procedures))
>> + "a list of unique <opensmtpd-match-
>> configuration> records, "]
>> + [(eq? table-whose-data-are-assoc-list? (car
>> procedures))
>> + (string-append
>> + "an <opensmtpd-table-configuration> record whose
>> fieldname 'values' are an assoc-list \n"
>> + "(eg: (opensmtpd-table-configuration (name
>> \"table\") (data '(\"joshua\" . \"$encrypted$password\")))), ")]
>> + [(eq? file-exists? (car procedures))
>> + "file, "]
>> + [else "has an incorrect value, "])
>> + (loop (cdr procedures)))))))
>> + (add-comma-or (string-append (string-drop-right string 2) ".\n")))
>
> Using a table, map and string-join might be wiser. If this is the only
> place add-comma-or is used, you can replace it by
> (string-append
> (string-join (butlast strings) ",")
> ", or " (last strings))
> where you only need to define butlast.
I'll take a look.
>
>> +;; TODO can I M-x raise-sexp (string=? string var) in this
>> procedure? and get rid of checking
>> +;; if the var is a string? The previous string-in-list? had that
>> check.
>> +;; (string-in-list? '("hello" 5 "cat")) currently works. If I M-x
>> raise-sexp (string=? string var)
>> +;; then it will no longer work.
>> +(define (string-in-list? string list)
>> + (primitive-eval (cons 'or (map (lambda (var) (and (string? var)
>> (string=? string var))) list))))
>
> Ever heard of member?
Will use it.
>
>> +(define (my/sanitize var record fieldname list-of-procedures)
>> + (if (is-value-right-type? var list-of-procedures record fieldname)
>> + var
>> + (begin
>> + (display (string-append "<" record "> fieldname: '"
>> fieldname "' is of type "
>> + (list-of-procedures->string list-of-
>> procedures) "\n"))
>> + (throw 'bad! var))))
>> +
>> +;; Some example opensmtpd-table-configurations:
>> +;;
>> +;; (opensmtpd-table-configuration (name "root accounts") (data
>> '(("joshua" . "root@dismail.de") ("joshua" .
>> "postmaster@dismail.de"))))
>> +;; (opensmtpd-table-configuration (name "root accounts") (data
>> (list "mysite.me" "your-site.com")))
>> +;; TODO should <opensmtpd-table-configuration> support have a
>> fieldname 'file'?
>> +;; Or should I change name to name-or-file ?
>> +(define-record-type* <opensmtpd-table-configuration>
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration make-opensmtpd-table-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-table-configuration?
>> + this-record
>> + (name opensmtpd-table-configuration-name ;; string
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (my/sanitize var "opensmtpd-table-configuration"
>> "name" (list string?)))))
>> + (file-db opensmtpd-table-configuration-file-db
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (my/sanitize var "opensmtpd-table-
>> configuration" "file-db"
>> + (list boolean?)))))
>> + ;; FIXME support an aliasing table as described here:
>> + ;; https://man.openbsd.org/table.5
>> + ;; One may have to use the record file for this. I don't think
>> tables support a table like this:
>> + ;; table "name" { joshua =
>> joshua@gnucode.me,joshua@gnu-hurd.com,joshua@propernaming.org, root =
>> root@gnucode.me }
>> + ;; If values is an absolute filename, then it will use said
>> filename to house the table info.
>> + ;; filename must be an absolute filename.
>> + (data opensmtpd-table-configuration-data
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (my/sanitize var "opensmtpd-table-
>> configuration" "values"
>> + (list file-exists? list-of-
>> strings? assoc-list?)))))
>> + ;; is a list of values or key values
>> + ;; eg: (list "mysite.me" "your-site.com")
>> + ;; eg: (list ("joshua" . "joshua@gnu.org") ("james" .
>> "james@gnu.org"))
>> + ;; I am currently making these values be as assocation list of
>> strings only.
>> + ;; FIXME should I allow a var like this?
>> + ;; (list (cons "gnucode.me" 234.949.392.23))
>> + ;; can be of type: (quote list-of-strings) or (quote assoc-list)
>> + ;; (opensmtpd-table-configuration-type record) returns the values'
>> type. The user SHOULD NEVER set the type.
>> + ;; TODO jpoiret: on irc reccomends that I just use an outside
>> function to determine fieldname 'values', type.
>> + ;; it would be "simpler" and possibly easier for the next person
>> working on this code to understand what is happening.
>> + (type opensmtpd-table-configuration-type
>> + (default #f)
>> + (thunked)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (cond [(opensmtpd-table-configuration-data this-
>> record)
>> + (if (list-of-strings? (opensmtpd-table-
>> configuration-data this-record))
>> + (quote list-of-strings)
>> + (quote assoc-list))]
>
> Just a quick side note, we don't usually intermix [ and (. It's all (.
Yeah I saw that in the coding style. I'll fix it.
>
>> [skipping a bit of stuff, may check later...]
>> +(define-record-type* <opensmtpd-option-configuration>
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration make-opensmtpd-option-configuration
>> + opensmtpd-option-configuration?
>> + (option opensmtpd-option-configuration-option
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (if (and (string? var)
>> + (or (string-in-list? var (list
>> "fcrdns" "rdns"
>> + "src"
>> "helo"
>> + "auth"
>> "mail-from"
>> + "rcpt-to"
>> + "for"
>> + "for any"
>> "for local"
>> + "for
>> domain" "for rcpt-to"
>> + "from any"
>> "from auth"
>> + "from
>> local" "from mail-from"
>> + "from
>> rdns" "from socket"
>> + "from src"
>> "auth"
>> + "helo"
>> "mail-from"
>> + "rcpt-to"
>> "tag" "tls"
>> + ))))
>> + var
>> + (begin
>> + (display (string-append "<opensmtpd-
>> option-configuration> fieldname: 'option' is of type \n"
>> + "string. The
>> string can be either 'fcrdns', \n"
>> + " 'rdns', 'src',
>> 'helo', 'auth', 'mail-from', or 'rcpt-to', \n"
>> + "'for', 'for
>> any', 'for local', 'for domain', 'for rcpt-to', \n"
>> + "'from any',
>> 'from auth', 'from local', 'from mail-from', 'from rdns', 'from
>> socket', \n"
>> + "'from src',
>> 'auth helo', 'mail-from', 'rcpt-to', 'tag', or 'tls' \n"
>> + ))
>> + (throw 'bad! var))))))
>
> This is a little verbose for what it does.
Fair I suppose. I'll see if I can shorten it.
>
>> +(define-record-type* <opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration>
>
> What is a "listen-on"?
"listen-on" refers to the "listen on" in smtpd.conf:
https://man.openbsd.org/smtpd.conf
lan_addr = "192.168.0.1"
listen on $lan_addr
listen on $lan_addr tls auth
>> +(define-record-type* <opensmtpd-listen-on-socket-configuration-
>> configuration>
>
> Again, could this just be <opensmtpd-socket-configuration>?
I would prefer to have two data types for "listen on" and
"listen on socket". "listen on socket" only supports 3 options, where
"listen on" supports 19.
https://man.openbsd.org/smtpd.conf
;;valid record
(openstmpd-listen-on-configuration
(tag "port-48")
(port 48))
;;invalid record and will result in an error as it should.
(openstmpd-listen-on-socket-configuration
(tag "port-48")
(port 48))
>
>> (define-record-type* <opensmtpd-configuration>
>> opensmtpd-configuration make-opensmtpd-configuration
>> opensmtpd-configuration?
>> - (package opensmtpd-configuration-package
>> - (default opensmtpd))
>> + (package opensmtpd-configuration-package
>> + (default opensmtpd))
>> (config-file opensmtpd-configuration-config-file
>> - (default %default-opensmtpd-config-file)))
>> + (default #f))
>> + ;; FIXME/TODO should I include a admd authservid entry?
>> +
>> + ;; TODO sanitize this properly with perhaps a <sanitize-
>> configuration>.
>> + (bounce opensmtpd-configuration-bounce
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (my/sanitize var "opensmtpd-configuration"
>> "bounce"
>> + (list false? list?)))))
>> + (cas opensmtpd-configuration-cas
>> + (default #f)
>> + (sanitize (lambda (var)
>> + (my/sanitize var "opensmtpd-configuration" "cas"
>> + (list false? list-of-opensmtpd-ca-
>> configuration?)))))
>> + ;; list of many records of type opensmtpd-listen-on-configuration
>> + (listen-ons opensmtpd-configuration-listen-ons
>
> What does opensmtpd acutally listen on?
>From the documentation:
listen on interface [family] [options]
Listen on the interface for incoming connections, using the same syntax as
ifconfig(8). The interface parameter may also be an interface group, an IP
address, or a domain name. Listening can optionally be restricted to a specific
address family, which can be either inet4 or inet6.
listen on socket [options]
Listen for incoming SMTP connections on the Unix domain socket
/var/run/smtpd.sock. This is done by default, even if the directive is absent.
>
>> [...]
>
> Too much to check, too little time. Maybe return later.
To summarize the tasks that you have given me are:
1) Write a proper changelog.
2) define "string-in-list?" with member?
Are there other procedures that could use this?
3) replace [] with ()
4) Shorten the sanitize procedure for opensmtpd-option-configuration
Thanks for reviewing!
Joshua