[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56770: LGTM: [PATCH v3] gnu: Add grimshot. (LGTM)
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
bug#56770: LGTM: [PATCH v3] gnu: Add grimshot. (LGTM) |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2022 20:42:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.1 |
Am Mittwoch, dem 27.07.2022 um 00:06 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> LGTM, with the caveat that I only looked at the package definition
> during reviewing.
Well, I also built the package, so together this must mean it's fine,
right? Either way, I trust you, so I pushed it.
> (Also, trying out a new convention for indicating that a patch
> appears ready: prefix the subject with LGTM)
IMHO one LGTM per header suffices. I think the prefix is better than
the suffix because the latter will likely be truncated.
Cheers