guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#57683] [PATCH] gnu: zuo: Use mirrored repository.


From: Maxime Devos
Subject: [bug#57683] [PATCH] gnu: zuo: Use mirrored repository.
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:40:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0



On 19-09-2022 20:33, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
Am Montag, dem 19.09.2022 um 15:53 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
On 19-09-2022 04:06, Philip McGrath wrote:
When I hear the word "unbundle", I think of configuring Racket and
Chez Scheme to use our shared Zlib and removing their vendored
copies. I don't see how the concept applies usefully to the
scenario of multiple pieces of software, some of which are useful
independently, being developed upstream in the same source tree.
Like, what would it mean to "unbundle" gfortran from gcc?
In case of gcc, I think updating the components separately doesn't
make much sense (from what I hear, it's the same situation for Racket
and Zuo, where 'Zuo' is just a component of Racket, not something
independent that's 'merely' a dependency of Racket).
I'd like to point out that the purpose of Zuo is basically having a
schemey make.  We don't bundle make with GCC, do we?

We don't, and it don't see how this comparison is relevant -- how is being make-ish relevant to whether something is bundling or whether something is acceptable to bundle?

Unlike Zuo only being used as part of Racket and developed as part of Racket (to my knowledge), "make" is used and developed outside GCC, with an independent release cycle.

Greetings,
Maxime.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]