[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28690: provide a lib output for boost
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
bug#28690: provide a lib output for boost |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2022 17:06:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 13:35, post@thomasdanckaert.be wrote:
> On 2022-06-23 12:01, zimoun wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 at 03:30, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 16:45, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This patch #28690 [1] is about adding an output to boost. The aim is to
>>>> reduce the closure size.
>>>> The last message if from Dec. 2017 and indicates some issues.
>>>>
>>>> 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28690>
>>> Since some work remains and it is not clear if it is worth to complete
>>> such work about adding more outputs to boost, I plan to mark this report
>>> as ’donewontfix’. Let me know if it is worth to keep it open.
>> Any objection closing? If not, I will close it in 2 weeks.
> I'm no longer a very active contributor (or user :/), so not sure I'm the
> right person to judge this. Reducing boost package size is a nice thing to
> do, but I'm not going to do the necessary work of building all (or at least a
> significant subset of) boost reverse dependencies to check if the approach
> above works, or if more changes are necessary.
I agree that the closure of boost deserve more love.
> I guess someone can always pick up the patch again when they feel the need for
> a smaller boost package.
Well, I am in favor to close it because it requires some work for
rebasing, etc. and the pending patches are such large that I am doubtful
people wanting to work on reducing the closure of boost will start to
look here. :-)
Cheers,
simon
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#28690: provide a lib output for boost,
zimoun <=