[bug#58812] [bug#59164] Coding style: similarly-named variables

[zimoun]

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 16:02, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, ’mutate-*’ is not really mutating.  Maybe I miss something and
> from my understanding, this ’let*’reads,
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (let ((my-target "something"))
>   (let ((my-target (mutate-once my-target)))
>     (let ((my-target (mutate-twice my-target)))
>       (do-something-with my-target))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, it compiles to something similar…

>                                                     And I think, the
> pattern is manually doing what ’let*’ is already doing for you.

…for instance, it reads,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix-user)> (macroexpand
'(let* ((my-target "something")
       (my-target (mutate-once my-target))
       (my-target (mutate-twice my-target)))
 (do-something-with my-target)))

$1= #<tree-il 
(let (my-target) (my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-114)
     ((const "something"))
     (let (my-target) (my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-116)
          ((call (toplevel mutate-once) (lexical my-target 
my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-114)))
          (let (my-target) (my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-118)
               ((call (toplevel mutate-twice) (lexical my-target 
my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-116)))
               (call (toplevel do-something-with) (lexical my-target 
my-target-11e760207b4c89cb-118)))))>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Cheers,
simon