[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs. |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:27:34 +0100 |
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:09, Abhishek Cherath <abhi@quic.us> wrote:
> guix package has --install-from-expression, but I guess that doesn't
> propagate to guix install because that's an alias for guix package -i
Yes, this appears to me covering your use case for hidden packages.
Well, I even missed it in my previous message [1]. :-)
So I still miss what is the use case. For instance,
guix package -e '(@@ (gnu packages rust) rust-1.65)'
works and all the transformation options are also available in “guix
package”. Therefore, in the command line,
guix package -i $(guix build …)
I miss what the … (dots) could be that cannot be expressed without “guix
build”. Maybe cross-compiled packages with --system or --target?
1: <86bkoxfe7y.fsf@gmail.com">https://yhetil.org/guix/86bkoxfe7y.fsf@gmail.com>
Cheers,
simon
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
bug#59520: [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., zimoun, 2022/11/23
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23
[bug#59520] [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/11/23