[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#60240] [PATCH] [WIP] gnu: Add python-3.11.
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
[bug#60240] [PATCH] [WIP] gnu: Add python-3.11. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jan 2023 18:36:36 +0100 |
Hi Tanguy,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 16:32, Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:
> This leads me to my first question: wouldn't it be better to write a "fresh"
> package definition not inheriting from `python-2` (deprecated since 2020) and
> `python-3.9` (soon to be replaced)?
Yes, it would be nice to have Python 3 as the package definition. And
maybe Python 2 as inheriting from Python 3. :-)
> Another question would be: should I first write a package definition
> for `python-3.10` so we have it in the history and one could use the
> time machine to install it?
Well, it appears to me fine to jump from 3.9 to 3.11 dropping 3.10.
Cheers,
simon
- [bug#60240] [PATCH] [WIP] gnu: Add python-3.11.,
Simon Tournier <=