guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#60636] [PATCH] Add 'manifest.scm'


From: Brian Cully
Subject: [bug#60636] [PATCH] Add 'manifest.scm'
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:18:18 -0500
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2


Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

This is intended for the Shepherd repository, right?

Yes. The shepherd documentation pointed me to the Guix ML and bugtracker. If there’s somewhere better, I can re-submit.

The value this provides above 'guix shell -D shepherd' is that it
includes the build system bootstrapping packages too (autoconf,
automake, etc.), right?

That’s correct. Shepherd can’t be built from a checkout using ‘guix shell -D shepherd’ because (according to Ludo) Guix uses the tarball as a source, not the git repository. Ludo did mention on IRC that shepherd could probably use a manifest.scm when I asked him about it, but I don’t want to speak for him more than that.

Are all these items really needed?  Why do we
need GCC, or glibc or gettext for example?

I added every item in response to one of the build steps failing. GCC is needed, for instance, because configure tests for the existence of a working C compiler (probably because of etc/crash-handler.c, but I couldn’t say for sure), glibc is needed because we’ve got a C compiler in the mix, and gettext is needed for ‘autoconf-point’.

-bjc





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]