[bug#60837] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add emacs-auto-compile.

[Cayetano Santos]

> lun. 16 janv. 2023 at 15:31, Liliana Marie Prikler 
> <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> ...

> Am Montag, dem 16.01.2023 um 13:38 +0100 schrieb Cayetano 
> Santos:
> > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-auto-compile): New 
> > variable.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm 
> > b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > index 5f60d82ad5..ea97cb09a2 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
> > @@ -259,6 +259,28 @@ (define-module (gnu packages emacs-xyz)
> >  ;;; Emacs hacking.
> >  ;;;
> >
> > +(define-public emacs-auto-compile
> > +  (package
> > +    (name "emacs-auto-compile")
> > +    (version "1.7.2")
> > +    (source (origin
> > +              (method git-fetch)
> > +              (uri (git-reference
> > +                    (url
> > "https://github.com/emacscollective/auto-compile.git";)
> > +                    (commit version)))
> > +              (sha256
> > +               (base32
> > +
> > "1njnyilv6lxnbvi6yrgzg6qjhf6vgh4fpag4hav1j45718y6kd31"))))
> > +    (build-system emacs-build-system)
> > +    (propagated-inputs (list emacs-compat emacs-packed))
> > +    (home-page 
> > "https://github.com/emacscollective/auto-compile";)
> > +    (synopsis "Automatically compile Emacs Lisp libraries")
> > +    (description
> > +     "This package provides two minor modes which 
> > automatically
> > recompile Emacs Lisp
> Note how you're exceeding fill-column.
> > +source files. Together these modes guarantee that Emacs never 
> > loads
> Use two spaces at the end of sentences.

Sorry for that, won’t forget next time.

> > outdated
> > +byte code files.")
> > +    (license license:gpl3+)))

> I also moved this before emacs-auto-sudoedit.  Placing packages
> directly at the start or end f files makes it mildly harder to 
> rebase.
>
> The package appears to build fine with both emacs and 
> emacs-minimal, so
> if there's no objection, I'll push this (with some fixes re the 
> above
> points) on the 29th.

Fine with me.

Cheers,