Re: [Health-dev] [bug #65387] Issues with the new unified importer

[tumashu]

I think we

should keep this sort of pre-validation,

At the moment,  we have valid, and valid each line at the moment,  pre-valid may let import faster, but let code more complicated, maybe not worth.

https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/health/rev/0c5430870e3e

--
发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版

<br/><br/><br/>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Falcon" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
To: "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com>, "Gerald Wiese" <wiese@gnuhealth.org>, "Luis Falcon" <falcon@gnuhealth.org>, health-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Sun,  3 Mar 2024 06:25:54 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [bug #65387] Issues with the new unified importer

Update of bug #65387 (group health):

                  Status:                    None => In Progress            
                 Release:                    None => 4.4.0                  

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #5:

Great!


I think is a good idea to keep both name and code, since depending on the lab
analyzer or laboratory will deliver one or the other.


As a side note, the original script validated the existance of the labtest
itself. The program would about if the lab test did not exist. I think we
should keep this sort of pre-validation, but we can discuss it in other thread
:)

Bests 


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65387>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/