[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens
From: |
John W. Millaway |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:46:18 -0800 (PST) |
> If Flex adapts the same mangling scheme, then `...' within actions should
> be mangled into C/C++ labels. Thus,
> "!=" { return `!=' }
> might be legal. Or one may even has that as default.
I doubt it will ever fly. What about '\012', which is legal C, but should not
be "mangled"? One thing about flex, it doesn't mess with your C code, and
that's probably a good thing to preserve.
> But
> . { return yytext[0]; }
> would not work. It is still possible to reserve this character range, so
> that Bison can issue the proper error message.
But remember we're looking ahead to unicode.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, (continued)
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/03
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens,
John W. Millaway <=
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, John W. Millaway, 2002/04/05
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/08
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/08
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/03
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Miles Bader, 2002/04/03
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/04
- Re: RFC: enum instead of #define for tokens, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/05