[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simplifying a "recursive, zero-or more" - grammar
|
From: |
Frans Englich |
|
Subject: |
Re: Simplifying a "recursive, zero-or more" - grammar |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:15:26 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.50 |
On Monday 20 February 2006 02:11, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Frans Englich wrote:
[...]
> > In other words, this grammar (intentionally) allows zero or more
> > DefaultNAmespaceDecl, Setter or NamespaceDecl in arbitrary order. For
> > example: "Setter, Setter, NamespaceDecl", or simply "<empty>".
>
> No, it allows 0, 1, or 2 only
[...]
> This is 0 or more.
Ups!
Thanks,
Frans