Re: Help resolving a conflict

[Hans Aberg]

On 20 Mar 2009, at 00:25, Clarke wrote:

> I am a total newbie, and can't seem to resolve a conflict with this
> rule:
> %nonassoc LOWER_PRECEDENCE_TOKEN

Look into the .output file that Bison can generate, for the state with  
the conflicting rules, and the parsing dot "." in those. Then apply  
token precedences to the tokens immediately before and after those. If  
there is a grammar variable instead of tken there, some grammar  
rewriting or perhaps GLR must be used.

> I put the %prec to try to resolve, but still get the shift/reduce
> conflict.  Any ideas?  Thanks!

Then use %prec one of those.

  Hans Aberg