[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: header file guards conflict
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: header file guards conflict |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2012 15:41:15 +0200 |
On 21 May 2012, at 11:34, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Is there a better way to do it?
>
> This is indeed a problem. I'm sure what the best way to
> address this is. In addition, in some cases, creating the
> files location.hh, stack.hh etc. is more troublesome than
> useful.
Perhaps add infixes 'loc', 'stk', etc., so that a parser with name <name> gets
files
<name>.loc.h
<name>.stk.h
etc.
> Also, some people would like to be able to rename the location.hh
> file.
Then there would be additional rules for overriding.
Hans
- Re: skeletons: remove support for unused directive (was: header file guards conflict), (continued)
- Re: skeletons: remove support for unused directive (was: header file guards conflict), Akim Demaille, 2012/05/22
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/22
- RFC: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: RFC: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/22
Re: header file guards conflict, Wei Song, 2012/05/21
Re: header file guards conflict,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21