[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail
From: |
Andrew Stribblehill |
Subject: |
Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:19:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Quoting Bas van der Vlies <basv@sara.nl> (2003-07-30 11:06:05 BST):
> Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
>
> >Quoting Bas van der Vlies <basv@sara.nl> (2003-07-30 10:34:53 BST):
> >>Should we not use the same syntax for turning on/off actions
> >> cfagent -z sysadm, smptfrom, ....
> >>
> >>It is easier to understand which variables we ask and we get back.
> >>For me it make sense and there is a mechanism to query the cfagent
> >>variables.
> >
> >Yes, that's nicer, I agree. Currently we use ':' as the standard
> >separator don't we? So would 'cfagent -z foo:bar:baz -z quux -zbongo'
> >be okay (as a bizarre way) to ask for foo, bar, baz, quux and bongo?
> >
> No the separator is ','. From the docs cfagent -j copy,tidy ;-)
> cfagent -x boo,bar,baz -z quux -zbongo is one bizarre way to ask
> for some variables.
Yes, you're right. Even the code agrees with you ;) So Mark, want me
to code this?
--
SOUTH BISCAY
VARIABLE BECOMING NORTHERLY 3 OR 4. MAINLY FAIR. GOOD
- cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/29
- Re: cfexecd mail, Mark . Burgess, 2003/07/29
- Re: cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/29
- Re: cfexecd mail, Mark . Burgess, 2003/07/29
- Re: cfexecd mail, Andrew Stribblehill, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Andrew Stribblehill, 2003/07/29
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/30
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Andrew Stribblehill, 2003/07/30
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/30
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail,
Andrew Stribblehill <=
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Mark . Burgess, 2003/07/30
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Bas van der Vlies, 2003/07/30
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail, Mark . Burgess, 2003/07/30