[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:49:29 +0200 (MEST) |
Do you mean buf_size (file block size) or bufsize (internal array size)?
What does this have to do with rpms?
M
On 8 Apr, Chip Seraphine wrote:
>
> I've been fooling around in v 2.1.3 with the new RPM stuff and so far it
> seems quite nice. The one issue is that I had to significantly jack up
> my minimum buf_size (client.c line 543) from 2048 to 8192; this seems
> somewhat unavoidable if you are using the packages: toys, unless you are
> only using it to add the occasional odd RPM instead of the whole lot.
>
> Cfengine does a lot more than it used to, and humongeous class strings are
> probably becoming more common. Perhaps we could up it some to reflect this?
>
> Here's the tiny change I made in 2.1.3 to allow me to do
> CFLAGS="-DMIN_CLIENT_BUF_SIZE=8192" on the ./configure line. If others
> are having this issue it may prove convenient.
>
>
> --- client.c 2004-04-08 11:15:53.000000000 -0500
> +++ client.c.orig 2004-04-08 11:12:40.000000000 -0500
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@
>
> if (buf_size < 2048)
> {
> - buf_size = MIN_CLIENT_BUF_SIZE;
> + buf_size = 2048;
> }
>
> if (ip->encrypt == 'y')
>
>
> --- cf.defs.h 2004-04-08 11:15:20.000000000 -0500
> +++ cf.defs.h.orig 2004-04-08 11:12:46.000000000 -0500
> @@ -345,10 +345,6 @@
>
> #define CFLOGSIZE 1048576 /* Size of lock-log before
> rotation */
>
> -#ifndef MIN_CLIENT_BUF_SIZE
> -#define MIN_CLIENT_BUF_SIZE 2048
> -#endif
> -
> /* Output control defines */
>
> #define Verbose if (VERBOSE || DEBUG || D2) printf
>
>
> <FEATURE_REQUEST type="cleverly disguised as speculation">
> This might not be as necessary if there were some more granular means of
> assembling ${allclasses}-like strings; like an
> AddClassnameToStringButOnlyIfItIsActuallyDefined(class1 class2 classN) sort
> of thing that jammed its argument classes into ${someclasses} if they were
> true, so that I could then call my scripts/modules with ${someclasses} (or
> a copy of same) as an argument instead of ${allclasses}.
>
> Or do most people not routinely use cfengine classes to turn on/off large
> numbers of options to scripts and modules?
> </FEATURE_REQUEST>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Chip Seraphine, 2004/04/08
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore,
Mark . Burgess <=
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Chip Seraphine, 2004/04/08
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Mark . Burgess, 2004/04/10
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Chip Seraphine, 2004/04/14
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Mark . Burgess, 2004/04/14
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Chip Seraphine, 2004/04/14
- Re: minimum buf_size doesn't fit me anymore, Mark . Burgess, 2004/04/14