Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?

[Galen Boyer]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> I don't follow your logic of this being a "GNU" list.  It's at
> *least* 1/2 (even 2/3) non GNU :-) We're discussing a product
> for MS Windows so surely the context here is at best ambiguous.

Okay, decent point.  I guess people that are asking questions to
a GNU group would respect the GNU definition of free.  But maybe
this group are the people most likely to disagree?  Hm...  

> And anyway, if the FSF decided to define Pi=3 that would still
> not make it so, no matter where you talked about it.

Not a reasonable analogy, even if as a joke.

>> > The FSF is not the only "one true path".
>> 
>> Try saying that on alt.religion.emacs.  Come on, I dare you...
> 
> Shouldn't that be alt.religion.scientology.emacs.

It is all things that one needs it to be, as long as you find
your way to the one true light.

> After all, it seems that the RMS brainwashing is almost total
> for some participants :-)

Well.  Being able to use this fantastic software is enough for me
to think that the FSF is probably on to something.  

-- 
Galen deForest Boyer
Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground.