[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc
|
From: |
Stephen F. Heffner |
|
Subject: |
RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:49:04 -0700 |
John Dallman wrote:
> ... Windows NT/2000/XP are "real" operating systems in that
> they protect the hardware against interference by programs.
Maybe so, but they're "unreal" in that they allow an application
to clobber another application or even the OS itself. No self-
respecting OS allows that. And don't get me started on the
Registry...
Sorry, couldn't let that one go by. My 2c worth...
Stephen F. Heffner, President | Phone: +1(480)626-5503
------------ | Fax: +1(480)626-7618
Pennington Systems Incorporated | Email: address@hidden
8655 East Via de Ventura, Suite G200 | Web: http://WWW.Pennington.com
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 USA | XTRAN: A software engineering meta-tool
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, (continued)
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, David Vanderschel, 2007/01/22
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/23
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Ryan Krauss, 2007/01/25
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/25
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Dallman, John, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/26
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc,
Stephen F. Heffner <=
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26