Re: [help-gengetopt] Re: GNU Gengetopt 2.22

[Andre Noll]

On 09:18, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:

> >and for the type punning question, I preferred not to pass a void ** 
> >pointer (I zero the pointer outside the function).
> >
> >Could you please check this version?  I tried to recreate your compiler 
> >command line arguments so that I got the warnings too; now, with make 
> >check, I don't get warnings anymore...
> >
> 
> anyone tried this?

Yes, I just tried it, and I can confirm that the code generated by this
gengetopt version doesn't cause gcc to spit out the type punning
warnings.

Thanks a lot, Lorenzo
Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature